Author Topic: Valpo President/Board Decide to Sell Art Masterpieces to Pay for Dorm Renovation  (Read 9097 times)

peter_speckhard

  • ALPB Administrator
  • ALPB Contribution Leader
  • *****
  • Posts: 20905
    • View Profile
And the number of Lutheran students who want to go to a Missouri Synod college, even one only slightly related to the Synod, is also declining, perhaps as people hear of your internal struggles.
Because my daughter was on some I-want-a-Lutheran-college list years ago, she received some promotional material from a couple of concordias.
I would not have objected if she chose one, but she specifically chose a college from the progressive side of Lutheranism.
That's the point. She wanted a more progressive Lutheran school, which wasn't Valpo because of the association with the LCMS. She found a school that was more right for her. Few Lutheran schools have engineering, so Valpo is a draw for that. D1 basketball gives it more of a national name than some Lutheran schools, so Valpo gets a look from some students who never considered other Lutheran colleges simply because they've never heard of them. The Chapel of the Resurrection makes an impact on campus visits for some, distinguishing Valpo from other Lutheran schools. But that still leaves a small pool, and regionally Valpo competes with Concordia-Chicago for LCMS students, and in terms of other Christian schools there is anything from Wheaton to Goshen College to Notre Dame to the big Catholic schools in Chicago. Commuter students have good extensions of IU and Purdue in the region.

I say all this as one who has a daughter currently and happily enrolled at Valpo in the PA program. There is no question the general atmosphere of the place is gone from what it was. They used to have a 125 member marching band and held a big homecoming parade from downtown to campus with a big float contest. The stands at the game would be full. Recently they spent a lot of money building a new entrance set up for tailgating at games. The problem? Nobody uses it because nobody goes to the games. There is no band. There are no big rivalry games because they aren't in their own conference of other small schools in Indiana. You don't see students out and about doing stuff. Chapel isn't even held in the chapel, it is in the undercroft where everyone who comes fits comfortably.

They have done stupid thing after stupid thing to alienate their base clientele in order to attract others, and now find themselves with a vanishingly small clientele of people who say, "Of all the schools I can go to, Valpo is the very best one for me." Symbolic things go a long way for those not on campus regularly, too. Changing the name from Crusaders to Beacons was breathtakingly stupid, an unforced error that cost them dearly. I don't know anyone (and I know a huge number of VU grads) who wouldn't wear a Crusaders shirt but who now wears a Beacons shirt proudly. I know many who wore Crusaders shirts proudly but who will never wear a Beacons shirt and probably won't even wear their Crusaders shirt anymore. It was almost like saying, "Maybe if we spit on the enthusiasm, history, and memories of school spirit of the people who support us, the people who don't support us will start supporting us." My current congregation has several older members who in the past were regular givers to Valpo. I'll bet at least five have told me they'll never give to VU again (and this is with me being a grad and sending my kids there-- who knows how many don't want to tell me) because of some of these things. The way they went about getting a woman pastor on campus cost them. The way they introduced GALA on campus back in the 80's cost them huge. My uncle, who was a superintendent of schools in the region and sent his first child to Valpo but refused to send his other five, said it was just proof that what he'd been saying was true all along. His other five went to Purdue, were active in Lutheran ministry there, and all became very successful, the sort of people who might not endow buildings but who might give generously to universities. Not Valpo, though.

If you don't think symbolic things matter, I'll assert (though I can't bet because there is no way to prove the outcome) that Prof. Brauer removing his name from the museum would do more damage to Valpo than losing some paintings. He is part of the legacy of VU. He is holdover from the Kretzmann years. Alienating him alienates a whole ton of other people who hold VU close to their heart. There is a still a large cadre of retired VU professors and graduates in town and the region, and they have children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren all over the place, as well as beloved former students. That is the sort of thing that produces freshmen-- not stupid new logos and free bumper stickers.

My dad spent several years working with every Lutheran high school in the country. He worked to have a program whereby every Lutheran high principal could nominate a top graduate for what amounted to a full ride to VU. The goal was to establish VU as THE place where Lutheran high grads went. People would go there because their friends went there. They'd meet their future Lutheran spouses there. One year they celebrated the milestone of having 100 freshman (not all necessarily scholarship winners) from Lutheran high schools (mostly, but not all, from LCMS schools) enrolled. Then out of nowhere President Harre changed the program to give any graduate of a Lutheran high school something like a $1000 scholarship. In short order, enrollment from Lutheran high schools dropped precipitously. Whatever financial sense it made, it killed the spirit of the thing. It changed the character of the place. My dad gave his all to VU and by the end found little about it to love-- the whole spirit of it had been drained out of it for him.

If you just want to gain knowledge, you can do so online for almost free. If you just want to get a well paying job, you can go to trade school. If you're going to be a university, you need to offer way more than that, and everything Valpo had that amounted to way more than that they've bartered away. I really thought their last chance was to host a NALC seminary on campus. It seemed a natural fit. But that ship sailed, and now they're stuck selling off artworks to install air conditioning to attract freshmen, when they used to have freshmen who would endure no air conditioning because Valpo is where they wanted to be.       
« Last Edit: March 11, 2023, 07:34:34 PM by peter_speckhard »

peter_speckhard

  • ALPB Administrator
  • ALPB Contribution Leader
  • *****
  • Posts: 20905
    • View Profile
Another thing that has killed "the college experience" not just for Valpo but very much generally is the advent of coed dorms. Both my wife and I noticed on all our campus visits with our daughter how different and how subdued and lifeless dorm life seems to be. She went to a Jesuit school (John Carroll) and I went to VU, but we both remember walking through the halls to our dorm rooms and at least half the doors were open. That's sort of how you knew someone was home-- their door was open. So there was natural community. You sort of got to know people just be being around. There was a spirit and an atmosphere to dorm life. Without exception, however, the dorms we've visited recently featured 100% closed doors all the way down the hall. You don't walk by and see anyone. I think that is because women aren't going to leave their door open when men are walking around. We've banished women-only and men-only atmospheres and in so doing have banished atmosphere altogether. You walk down a silent corridor to the room with you number on it, like at a hotel late at night. It is quiet-- headphones, not speakers, are the norm. And there is virtually no interaction that isn't planned and intentional.

Again, that isn't a criticism of Valpo (except to the degree that I think they suffer from it like everyone else partially out of zeal for coed dorms) so much as an example of the loss of "the college experience" that makes today's students wonder what they're getting for their money and in turn makes it hard for schools that aren't taxpayer funded, well-endowed, or holders of a clear niche market to survive a shrinking pool of prospective students.

John_Hannah

  • ALPB Contribution Leader
  • *****
  • Posts: 5914
    • View Profile
And the number of Lutheran students who want to go to a Missouri Synod college, even one only slightly related to the Synod, is also declining, perhaps as people hear of your internal struggles.
Because my daughter was on some I-want-a-Lutheran-college list years ago, she received some promotional material from a couple of concordias.
I would not have objected if she chose one, but she specifically chose a college from the progressive side of Lutheranism.
That's the point. She wanted a more progressive Lutheran school, which wasn't Valpo because of the association with the LCMS. She found a school that was more right for her. Few Lutheran schools have engineering, so Valpo is a draw for that. D1 basketball gives it more of a national name than some Lutheran schools, so Valpo gets a look from some students who never considered other Lutheran colleges simply because they've never heard of them. The Chapel of the Resurrection makes an impact on campus visits for some, distinguishing Valpo from other Lutheran schools. But that still leaves a small pool, and regionally Valpo competes with Concordia-Chicago for LCMS students, and in terms of other Christian schools there is anything from Wheaton to Goshen College to Notre Dame to the big Catholic schools in Chicago. Commuter students have good extensions of IU and Purdue in the region.

I say all this as one who has a daughter currently and happily enrolled at Valpo in the PA program. There is no question the general atmosphere of the place is gone from what it was. They used to have a 125 member marching band and held a big homecoming parade from downtown to campus with a big float contest. The stands at the game would be full. Recently they spent a lot of money building a new entrance set up for tailgating at games. The problem? Nobody uses it because nobody goes to the games. There is no band. There are no big rivalry games because they aren't in their own conference of other small schools in Indiana. You don't see students out and about doing stuff. Chapel isn't even held in the chapel, it is in the undercroft where everyone who comes fits comfortably.

They have done stupid thing after stupid thing to alienate their base clientele in order to attract others, and now find themselves with a vanishingly small clientele of people who say, "Of all the schools I can go to, Valpo is the very best one for me." Symbolic things go a long way for those not on campus regularly, too. Changing the name from Crusaders to Beacons was breathtakingly stupid, an unforced error that cost them dearly. I don't know anyone (and I know a huge number of VU grads) who wouldn't wear a Crusaders shirt but who now wears a Beacons shirt proudly. I know many who wore Crusaders shirts proudly but who will never wear a Beacons shirt and probably won't even wear their Crusaders shirt anymore. It was almost like saying, "Maybe if we spit on the enthusiasm, history, and memories of school spirit of the people who support us, the people who don't support us will start supporting us." My current congregation has several older members who in the past were regular givers to Valpo. I'll bet at least five have told me they'll never give to VU again (and this is with me being a grad and sending my kids there-- who knows how many don't want to tell me) because of some of these things. The way they went about getting a woman pastor on campus cost them. The way they introduced GALA on campus back in the 80's cost them huge. My uncle, who was a superintendent of schools in the region and sent his first child to Valpo but refused to send his other five, said it was just proof that what he'd been saying was true all along. His other five went to Purdue, were active in Lutheran ministry there, and all became very successful, the sort of people who might not endow buildings but who might give generously to universities. Not Valpo, though.

If you don't think symbolic things matter, I'll assert (though I can't bet because there is no way to prove the outcome) that Prof. Brauer removing his name from the museum would do more damage to Valpo than losing some paintings. He is part of the legacy of VU. He is holdover from the Kretzmann years. Alienating him alienates a whole ton of other people who hold VU close to their heart. There is a still a large cadre of retired VU professors and graduates in town and the region, and they have children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren all over the place, as well as beloved former students. That is the sort of thing that produces freshmen-- not stupid new logos and free bumper stickers.

My dad spent several years working with every Lutheran high school in the country. He worked to have a program whereby every Lutheran high principal could nominate a top graduate for what amounted to a full ride to VU. The goal was to establish VU as THE place where Lutheran high grads went. People would go there because their friends went there. They'd meet their future Lutheran spouses there. One year they celebrated the milestone of having 100 freshman (not all necessarily scholarship winners) from Lutheran high schools (mostly, but not all, from LCMS schools) enrolled. Then out of nowhere President Harre changed the program to give any graduate of a Lutheran high school something like a $1000 scholarship. In short order, enrollment from Lutheran high schools dropped precipitously. Whatever financial sense it made, it killed the spirit of the thing. It changed the character of the place. My dad gave his all to VU and by the end found little about it to love-- the whole spirit of it had been drained out of it for him.

If you just want to gain knowledge, you can do so online for almost free. If you just want to get a well paying job, you can go to trade school. If you're going to be a university, you need to offer way more than that, and everything Valpo had that amounted to way more than that they've bartered away. I really thought their last chance was to host a NALC seminary on campus. It seemed a natural fit. But that ship sailed, and now they're stuck selling off artworks to install air conditioning to attract freshmen, when they used to have freshmen who would endure no air conditioning because Valpo is where they wanted to be.     

Valpo is like the rest of us, victims of sharp, sudden Christian decline. Not the perpetrator.

Peace. JOHN
Pr. JOHN HANNAH, STS

peter_speckhard

  • ALPB Administrator
  • ALPB Contribution Leader
  • *****
  • Posts: 20905
    • View Profile
I don’t suggest Valpo is the perpetrator of Christian decline. What Valpo is experiencing is not unique to Christian schools. Given the demographic decline that has led to a crash in the potential applicant pool nationally, the loss of social cache of the college degree, and the rising cost and falling career payoff of many degrees, it is just a tough time to be a university. Those that are thriving are elite, well-endowed private schools and large state schools. The only way for a school to thrive apart from that these days is to have a very loyal niche market that you serve, among whom people with the academic credentials to go to a more exclusive school will sacrifice that status degree to go to Valpo, and people who know they could get a good education at a state school are willing to pay a little more to go to Valpo. For that, you need to keep the other factors (academics and cost) at least ballpark close to the alternatives you’re asking people to forgo, and you have to cultivate community of people who already have reasons to choose Valpo. The former I think Valpo has done okay on. The latter is where they have failed.

Dave Likeness

  • ALPB Contribution Leader
  • *****
  • Posts: 5503
    • View Profile
There was a time, 40 to 50 years ago, when Valpo attracted
students who wanted an engineering degree.  Corporations
like General Motors and Caterpillar Inc. recruited Valpo grads.
They liked the strong moral character of these graduates.
Valpo was also known for placing 90% of their grads in their
first job in those days.

peter_speckhard

  • ALPB Administrator
  • ALPB Contribution Leader
  • *****
  • Posts: 20905
    • View Profile
There was a time, 40 to 50 years ago, when Valpo attracted
students who wanted an engineering degree.  Corporations
like General Motors and Caterpillar Inc. recruited Valpo grads.
They liked the strong moral character of these graduates.
Valpo was also known for placing 90% of their grads in their
first job in those days.
That is still true to a degree. The problem is that would-be engineers have Purdue close at hand, a world class engineering powerhouse, generally at a fraction of the cost. Rose-Hulman is also close by for those who want a smaller environment. Northwestern is also an hour away or so. So the idea of Valpo being a draw because of the strong moral fiber of its grads might possibly affect some company’s hiring decisions, engineers aren’t worried about getting a job either way. And I’m not sure anyone would discern a moral difference in Valpo grads as a subset of engineer applicants.

peter_speckhard

  • ALPB Administrator
  • ALPB Contribution Leader
  • *****
  • Posts: 20905
    • View Profile
https://legalinsurrection.com/2023/03/many-students-who-finished-high-school-during-the-pandemic-are-skipping-college/

This story takes the AP to task for calling it a "crisis", as though going to college were some kind a moral imperative, but the fact is that if you are a university, it is a crisis. Nationwide, college enrollment has fallen 8% in just three years, the steepest decline on record. Many people who theorized that students who graduated high school during Covid were simply delaying college a year or two are now realizing that those students aren't going to college at all. Or, if they do go to college, they have no intention of racking up the kind of debt it takes to keep colleges as currently constituted financially afloat. The old social contract involving college is no more. Those who are in it for the learning saw universities insisting that online learning during Covid was still worthy of tuition dollars, and do not believe them, but do realize that you can learn a lot online if you're really interested, either for free or for a lot less than per credit hour tuition. Those who simply wanted access to a good job are seeing white collar jobs paying less and offering less job satisfaction than they used to, and many no longer requiring a degree anyway. Those who want the "college experience" will either demand steep financial aid in order to avoid massive debt or, if they are able, will demand the trappings of that experience that only elite/endowed private schools or larger state schools can offer.

I go back to my initial assessment of the painting bruhaha at Valpo. I doubt the underlying issue is a sign of the administration and board being incompetent, financially foolish, out of touch with Valpo's real needs, or anything like that. I think they're the ones who have all the data, projections, and long term prospects in view and realize it is panic time. 


peter_speckhard

  • ALPB Administrator
  • ALPB Contribution Leader
  • *****
  • Posts: 20905
    • View Profile
We took our little extra-curricular choir of six students to Ft. Wayne this week to record choral pieces and hymns for Worship Anew. They got to sing for chapel at the seminary and tour the campus and so forth, especially liking the focus on art. Had a whole dorm building to ourselves to spend the night! On the way back we drove right past VU, so we stopped and went into the chapel. It was spring break, so nobody was around and we had the whole building to ourselves. The kids sang the last verse of The Lamb ("He rose, He rose, etc.") in honor of it being the Chapel of the Resurrection despite it being Lent. One thing the little trip brought home to me that I've suspected for a long time is that many kids are starved for beauty and profundity. Both chapels we visited were built in the 1950's (that wretched, conformist, decade) and both are indeed recognizably timebound to their era. But it was an era when it was conceivable to raise money for such projects and for people to see the point of them. The liberal arts didn't need a string of apologists making the case for their relevance. Not so today.

At a practical level, six 7th graders sang in the chapel and have it in their heads that they could go to college there. But will they be able to if they wanted to? The enrollment numbers in the articles are different, but the percentages are pretty dire. Enrollment down 29% in five years. That seems like a tipping point is near or might already have been reached. 

peter_speckhard

  • ALPB Administrator
  • ALPB Contribution Leader
  • *****
  • Posts: 20905
    • View Profile
https://campusreform.org/article?id=21537

One thing killing liberal arts colleges is the focus on education as job training. Liberals arts schools rightly disavow that approach, but that doesn't stop them from advertising the placement rate of their grades or from justifying the cost in terms in future salary benefits. The massive cost increases in tuition in the last few decades hinged on the idea that college was the gatekeeper to the white collar world, so the cost was justified. In the last ten years it has become clearer that whatever the justification of liberal arts education (and they are massive and incalculable), it isn't a better salary later on. From the article:


In an interview with Campus Reform, EdResearcher founder and managing director Fiona Hollands suggested that employers are no longer confident that four-year degrees prepare students for the workforce.

“Grade inflation and efforts to help everyone graduate from high school and attend college make it harder for employers to differentiate among applicants or trust traditional credentials,” Hollands said.

“People who earn microcredentials demonstrate initiative, motivation, and a willingness to go above and beyond by investing in developing their own skills and knowledge.”

Hollands hinted that microcredentials will also help in career fields that have not traditionally required a degree. “Microcredentials require less investment from the providers (and learners) resulting in more nimble responses to such changes,” she told Campus Reform.

States including Florida and Texas have invested in community colleges and other educational programs that provide workforce training. If employers develop trust in microcredentials, they could join the host of training programs that are able to quickly fill shortages in key industries such as information technology and healthcare.

[RELATED: PROF. GIORDANO: Community college is a better, more viable alternative for many students]

“Full degree programs take a lot of time to plan and to gain necessary approvals/accreditation such that this form of education cannot possibly keep up with technological advances that affect production and communication,” Hollands said.

The youngest generations also expect to receive credentials on demand.

“Gen Z and millennials are used to taking smaller, bite-size pieces,” a representative with UPCEA told Inside Higher Ed. “They were given rewards at earlier stages and milestones. [Higher ed] can have cake and eat it, too, with a degree, but we’ve also got to reward people for accomplishments along the way.”

MaddogLutheran

  • ALPB Contribution Leader
  • *****
  • Posts: 3816
  • It's my fantasy football avatar...
    • View Profile
https://campusreform.org/article?id=21537

One thing killing liberal arts colleges is the focus on education as job training. Liberals arts schools rightly disavow that approach, but that doesn't stop them from advertising the placement rate of their grades or from justifying the cost in terms in future salary benefits. The massive cost increases in tuition in the last few decades hinged on the idea that college was the gatekeeper to the white collar world, so the cost was justified. In the last ten years it has become clearer that whatever the justification of liberal arts education (and they are massive and incalculable), it isn't a better salary later on. From the article: [snip]

Concur wholeheartedly.  I leave it to the sociologists to explore why a bachelor's degree supplanted other job qualification metrics (this slams right into CRT), or even why tuition costs have risen more than inflation.  But the skyrocketing cost of higher education has made this completely irrational for liberal arts degrees.

Like many things in the real world, it's unfortunate that a liberal arts education has remained coupled with other degrees from the same institutions which can directly lead to professional earning power (business, engineering/tech, medical).  If only one could be charged less by universities for a degree with lesser earning power.  Of course that's unlikely to impossible.

Given all that, it's equally insane for undergrads to go into debt for a liberal arts degree.  That's where the entitlement mindset kicks in, and off.  I'm sorry, I have no sympathy that you went $80K into debt for a medieval French literature degree and you're now working as a barista.  That was a choice you made, even if you were ill-advised by "the system".  And make no mistake, "the system" is complicit (for its own self-interest), advising just that and indeed encouraging it, to perpetuate the cycle.

It's like I've said here repeatedly about the cost of a seminary education:  if the Church wants future pastors, and few congregations cannot afford to pay them lucratively to service tuition debt, then it needs to subsidize/decrease seminary tuition.  In the secular education realm, I'm sorry that this means that only the "wealthy" can afford a liberal arts degree.  Because you know, until relatively recently, that was always the case.  No one has a "right" to attend a college just because they got accepted--that's the first fallacy at play here.  No one buys a car or house if they can't afford the monthly payments.

There's nothing wrong with pursuing a liberal arts degree without any concern for future employment/earning prospects.  The educational enrichment can certainly be enough.  Prospective students need to face that stark truth and not blame others for their irrational decisions.  If more prospective students would avoid the debt path, and take alternate educational routes less costly (as described in Pastor Speckhard's link), market forces would begin correcting this problem.  Of course, the problem is that for most young people, going to college is not a take-it-or-leave-it situation where they can wait for the price to go down.  They are faced with the college price structure as it is when they graduate high school.  It's something of a mono/oligopoly to be frank.
« Last Edit: March 16, 2023, 11:55:39 AM by MaddogLutheran »
Sterling Spatz
ELCA pew-sitter

Jim Butler

  • ALPB Contribution Leader
  • *****
  • Posts: 2286
    • View Profile
https://campusreform.org/article?id=21537

One thing killing liberal arts colleges is the focus on education as job training. Liberals arts schools rightly disavow that approach, but that doesn't stop them from advertising the placement rate of their grades or from justifying the cost in terms in future salary benefits. The massive cost increases in tuition in the last few decades hinged on the idea that college was the gatekeeper to the white collar world, so the cost was justified. In the last ten years it has become clearer that whatever the justification of liberal arts education (and they are massive and incalculable), it isn't a better salary later on. From the article: [snip]

Concur wholeheartedly.  I leave it to the sociologists to explore why a bachelor's degree supplanted other job qualification metrics (this slams right into CRT), or even why tuition costs have risen more than inflation.  But the skyrocketing cost of higher education has made this completely irrational for liberal arts degrees.

For many years, a college degree was seen as a way for employers to prescreen prospective employees without actually screening anyone. Many of the jobs that required a degree didn't actually require a degree in order to do them. George Will famously pointed to a job ad for working in a warehouse in which the applicant needed a college degree and the ability to lift 50 pounds. Many years ago, we were looking for a copier. Every sales person I spoke to had a liberal arts degree (most in their mid-20s). I kept wondering why on earth someone would need a college degree to sell a copier it seemed superfluous to me.
"Pastor Butler... [is] deaf to the cries of people like me, dismissing our concerns as Satanic scenarios, denouncing our faith and our very existence."--Charles Austin

peter_speckhard

  • ALPB Administrator
  • ALPB Contribution Leader
  • *****
  • Posts: 20905
    • View Profile
One thing the article made clear is that employers are looking for self-motivated people. The learning can happen whether or not it is officially recorded. A person might know a tremendous amount about classical music or Shakespeare by taking Great Courses or simply exploring the topic on their own. So the liberal arts need not only to convince people to care about them, but to convince them that the difference between watching videos about them online vs. enrolling in an in-person class is worth, say, $1000 per class. That can't happen when the in person class amounts to watching a video. It invites people to enroll who don't really care about the topic but want the credit for having taken the class. What employers are looking for are people who want to learn the material but who don't really care about credit for taking the class. 

Dave Likeness

  • ALPB Contribution Leader
  • *****
  • Posts: 5503
    • View Profile
Pastor Speckhard mentioned his recent trip to Fort Wayne Seminary Chapel
and the Chapel at Valpo.

The Fort Wayne Seminary Chapel was dedicated in 1956 and has a seating
capacity of 575.  The Valpo Chapel was dedicated in 1959 and has seating
capacity of 2,000.  Enrollment at both of these places is in a down cycle and
so their chapels are not filled to capacity for worship. Enrollment is also down
at the St. Louis Seminary.  Their chapel was dedicated in 1992 and has a
seating capacity of 1,000 and is not filled for worship on a daily basis.

All three of these campuses have a chapel which is the focal point of their campus.
Sadly, their declining enrollment seems to make seating capacity a moot point.


Richard Johnson

  • ALPB Administrator
  • ALPB Contribution Leader
  • *****
  • Posts: 10806
  • Create in me a clean heart, O God.
    • View Profile
On this discussion, an interesting article in the March 6 New Yorker on "The End of the English Major" https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/03/06/the-end-of-the-english-major. It's about the decline of humanities majors at most universities.

The crisis, when it came, arrived so quickly that its scale was hard to recognize at first. From 2012 to the start of the pandemic, the number of English majors on campus at Arizona State University fell from nine hundred and fifty-three to five hundred and seventy-eight. Records indicate that the number of graduated language and literature majors decreased by roughly half, as did the number of history majors. Women’s studies lost eighty per cent. ... During the past decade, the study of English and history at the collegiate level has fallen by a full third. Humanities enrollment in the United States has declined over all by seventeen per cent, Townsend found. What’s going on? The trend mirrors a global one; four-fifths of countries in the Organization for Economic Coöperation reported falling humanities enrollments in the past decade. But that brings little comfort to American scholars, who have begun to wonder what it might mean to graduate a college generation with less education in the human past than any that has come before.
The Rev. Richard O. Johnson, STS