So you say nothing of “killing the life growing in the mother.”
It’s just that you use “viability” (a moving standard and one that makes no logical sense) to set the line for when abortion is allowed.
What does abortion do again?
You’re smarter than this. And your bigger problem is this — we are too.
The recent thread is about "life," not about abortion. Abortion kills a living fetus. Happy now?
A poll I just read indicated that a majority of Americas are in the messy middle of this debate. As I recall the number 50% thought that abortions should be legal, but limited. Fewer thought they should all be illegal or open to anyone who wanted.
I've stated and copied our church's position that an abortion
may be a responsible choice for three reasons:
1. to save the life of the mother
2. when the mother had not choice in the pregnancy, i.e., through rape or incest
3. a fetal abnormality that will result in severe suffering and very early death
Do you disagree that an abortion
may be a responsible choice in these circumstances?