The African election story is irrelevant.
Sharpen those reading skills, Norman. The language of my post was precise:
an election, not
this election. The article in question was also not specific to the African situation, but to elections in general, which means that this article's points could be applied to this year's election, but also to any other — which means that it
really is relevant to this year's election, as a yes or no for each point can be made in regard to what has just transpired, with judgements made accordingly.
I am also truly amused that you and Charles keep saying
shut up shut up shut up shut up when it comes to further discussion of the just-finished, still-not-completed US national election. Answer me this: Do you want possible fraud to stand? Do you want flaws in our system to be left unfixed? If your answer is
yes to these, then please explain
why — please note that there are few, if any, good places such an answer could come from.
Also: what on earth does this sentence possibly mean?
But I will note when they refer to the statement of those who do if I the president.