I think this past weekend's Gospel reading extended (for those on the 3 year) to include the parable of the two sons would have something contrary to say to this. The question is one of proper authority. Those who are wearing the dress of proper authority - the priests - are asking Jesus, the Nazarene bumpkin, where he gets his. They don't really question it, because it is obvious. But they wonder at its source and their relation to it. Since they won't give Jesus a straight answer, He feels no compulsion to give them one or to respect their outward authority. But he does give them an answer in parable form.
Roughly following Gibbs, the parable has two sons, both are partly obedient to the Father. The first tells dad off, but then goes and works. He respects the authority of the Kingdom in his repentance and life. The second tells dad sure, acknowledging the authority of the Kingdom, but then doesn't go and work that day. This son is in a precarious position in that we don't know when our life is required of us, but he too is one that it is possible walks "in the way of righteousness". Neither son truly questions to the authority of the Kingdom if they occasionally trespass. Jesus, whose authority is unquestioned, can work with either of these. The tax collectors and the prostitutes are all entering the Kingdom.
What he cannot work with is those dressed up in authority who both reject the Kingdom's authority and fail to repent. If the two sons are (no, yes) and (yes, no), the priests are (no, no). They rejected the Baptist - the fiery prophet - and they rejected Jesus - the one who came eating and drinking. They recognize he has authority, but they reject it over them. They consider their own its equal or superior. And Jesus - the son of the Kingdom - owes them no answer.
There are lots of caveats. We are not Jesus. Having the wisdom to discern the no-no's from the others is tough. That is ultimately not our job in the Kingdom of the Gospel. But it is our job in the Kingdom of the Law. Outlawing abortion would be a complete good. Just like outlawing slavery was. And people of principle and decency do not owe to those who are dressed up in the clothes of authority but do not respect its source an answer. Denying the chance, working within the system as created - it is completely constitutional for the President to appoint and the senate to confirm or ignore - of furthering a complete good would be evil itself. Arguing civility to maintain barbarity is an evil. And given that the officials (Catholic Biden for example) complaining have rejected both the more fiery prophetic words and the humble petitioning of say the march for life, those doing the work of the Kingdom owe no answer.