OK let's see.
Evangelical, definitely a trigger. There is a long history to this word but as we know positive history is no excuse for images that have been associated with with bad actions or attitudes. Evangelical has come to be associated with traditional, conservative, homophobic, misogynistic, predominately white (ipso facto racist) and cisgendered people. Current associations mean this part of the name really must go.
Lutheran, oh my no. Luther is an old, dead, white, cisgendered, European male. Could it get any worse? Well, he was also a known and blatant anti-Semitic racist. Although as forms of racism go, anti-Semitism is generally considered to of lesser concern and even indulged in by some current Democratic Congresspersons with only minor disapproval. Perhaps if they put out the story that they named their church after a famed civil rights leader they could sneak it through.
Church, well, maybe this could be kept but still problematic. Many groups identified as churches are notorious for using their supposed religious beliefs to justify discrimination against a number of oppressed groups. Does such an enlighted and socially conscious group want to have a name associated with such regressive and repressive groups?
in, a simple preposition, so probably not objectionable. It also provides the prefix for "inclusive." Although, "in" implies that there is an "out" which could be problematic for such an inclusively minded group. The jury is still out. Maybe another focus group could help.
America, just got to go. It has been demonstrated that America has a long history of racism, misogyny, homophobia, and oppression of the people who were here when the Europeans arrived. All in all, is there really anything great about America?
