Author Topic: Unholy  (Read 33442 times)

Charles Austin

  • ALPB Contribution Leader
  • *****
  • Posts: 14904
    • View Profile
    • Charles is Coloring
Re: Unholy
« Reply #240 on: July 01, 2020, 09:41:51 AM »
Peter:
Why should I be expected to pay for schools who teach things I disapprove of?
Me:
Well, Peter, unfortunately you live in a country that offers free public education, paid for with taxpayer funds. You get a chance to vote for your local school board. You get a chance to vote for your local state and federal representative. They get to make the laws and policies about such things.
Do you want to start a tax revolt over the matter? Go for it.
We have been through decades, literally decades of discussion about these matters. And you were acting as if it is 1948 and nothing has been said.
If you donít like whatís being taught in the public schools, then Work to get it changed, or send your kids to private schools.  On your own dimes. You donít get to take dimes and dollars away from the public education supportEd by the vast majority of our citizenry.
Retired ELCA Pastor. Iowa native. Oh, my. How close we were to a situation where many people with guns couldíve killed many members of Congress. The possible result? Martial law and/or Civil War. Thank God some people are still coming forward to tell the truth.

Charles Austin

  • ALPB Contribution Leader
  • *****
  • Posts: 14904
    • View Profile
    • Charles is Coloring
Re: Unholy
« Reply #241 on: July 01, 2020, 09:42:58 AM »
P. S. And we do allow homeschooling. I donít think thatís a good idea, but we allow it. There you are.
Retired ELCA Pastor. Iowa native. Oh, my. How close we were to a situation where many people with guns couldíve killed many members of Congress. The possible result? Martial law and/or Civil War. Thank God some people are still coming forward to tell the truth.

James_Gale

  • ALPB Contribution Leader
  • *****
  • Posts: 4109
    • View Profile
Re: Unholy
« Reply #242 on: July 01, 2020, 10:08:32 AM »
Well, considering the most recent Scotus decision, I am among those, probably a minority, who contend that the government should not be giving any money to private schools whether they are religious or not.
If you want to run a private school for a certain kind of student, or offer certain special things for certain families, fine, you can do that. But donít ask me to help you pay for it.
If you want to create a certain set of standards or type of curriculum or type of ďsocialĒ education, you are free to do so. With your own money. My concern is for the population as a whole, for education for all. Free public education is practically a hallmark of our country. To undercut it by providing funds for private schools, again, no matter what their religious standing, itís not a good idea.


Why would you favor a system that preserves private schools for the affluent but forces the poor--including many children from minority-majority communities--to attend what often are among our country's worst schools?  School-choice policies (vouchers, opportunity scholarships, etc.) enjoy wide support among African Americans precisely because they provide opportunities otherwise not available to get a good education. 

peter_speckhard

  • ALPB Administrator
  • ALPB Contribution Leader
  • *****
  • Posts: 19391
    • View Profile
Re: Unholy
« Reply #243 on: July 01, 2020, 10:09:15 AM »
Peter:
Why should I be expected to pay for schools who teach things I disapprove of?
Me:
Well, Peter, unfortunately you live in a country that offers free public education, paid for with taxpayer funds. You get a chance to vote for your local school board. You get a chance to vote for your local state and federal representative. They get to make the laws and policies about such things.
Do you want to start a tax revolt over the matter? Go for it.
We have been through decades, literally decades of discussion about these matters. And you were acting as if it is 1948 and nothing has been said.
If you donít like whatís being taught in the public schools, then Work to get it changed, or send your kids to private schools.  On your own dimes. You donít get to take dimes and dollars away from the public education supportEd by the vast majority of our citizenry.
That's my point. Precisely because I live in a country that offers free public education, paid for taxpayer funds, I must insist that it not discriminate for or against my religious views or anyone else's. In the state of Indiana we as the majority of voters have determined that the voucher system works best for students and parents and should include any and all schools without respect to creed. That should be the end of the matter. But your side insists on taking it to court on the grounds that you should never be forced to pay for children to learn what I might teach them, but I should be forced to pay for children to learn what you might teach them. 
« Last Edit: July 01, 2020, 12:43:34 PM by peter_speckhard »

Voelker

  • Guest
Re: Unholy
« Reply #244 on: July 01, 2020, 10:09:50 AM »
you live in a country that offers free public education, paid for with taxpayer funds.
Hmmmm.

peter_speckhard

  • ALPB Administrator
  • ALPB Contribution Leader
  • *****
  • Posts: 19391
    • View Profile
Re: Unholy
« Reply #245 on: July 01, 2020, 10:15:12 AM »
Well, considering the most recent Scotus decision, I am among those, probably a minority, who contend that the government should not be giving any money to private schools whether they are religious or not.
If you want to run a private school for a certain kind of student, or offer certain special things for certain families, fine, you can do that. But donít ask me to help you pay for it.
If you want to create a certain set of standards or type of curriculum or type of ďsocialĒ education, you are free to do so. With your own money. My concern is for the population as a whole, for education for all. Free public education is practically a hallmark of our country. To undercut it by providing funds for private schools, again, no matter what their religious standing, itís not a good idea.


Why would you favor a system that preserves private schools for the affluent but forces the poor--including many children from minority-majority communities--to attend what often are among our country's worst schools?  School-choice policies (vouchers, opportunity scholarships, etc.) enjoy wide support among African Americans precisely because they provide opportunities otherwise not available to get a good education.
We've seen a major increase in voucher students this year. I should note that many of the voucher students are also church members. The income threshold to qualify is quite high. But slightly less than half the students this fall will be in the voucher program. The main beneficiaries are students from Hammond, East Chicago, and Gary, all of which have truly failing school districts where ethnic minorities are in the majority. It is amazing that some people construe it such that a policy that gives poor people in failing school districts access to the same education as everyone else is somehow bad.
« Last Edit: July 01, 2020, 12:44:10 PM by peter_speckhard »

James J Eivan

  • Guest
Re: Unholy
« Reply #246 on: July 01, 2020, 10:18:56 AM »
Well, it's not "me and my people who are so victimized and oppressed," but does 63 million dead children, a disproportionate number of whom are Black count?
Deacon Hummel  ... you hit the nail on the head ... it's really Some Black Lives Matter  ... or Black Lives Matter ... when politically expedient.


Together with my Pastor,  I believe that ALL lives matter to Christ  ... and that is what REALLY counts.

MaddogLutheran

  • ALPB Contribution Leader
  • *****
  • Posts: 3585
  • It's my fantasy football avatar...
    • View Profile
Re: Unholy
« Reply #247 on: July 01, 2020, 10:49:36 AM »
We've see a major increase in voucher students this year. I should note that many of the voucher students are also church members. The income threshold to qualify is quite high. But slightly less than half the students this fall will be in the voucher program. The main beneficiaries are students from Hammond, East Chicago, and Gary, all of which has truly failing school districts where ethnic minorities are in the majority. It is amazing that some people construe it such that a policy that gives poor people in failing school districts access to the same education as everyone else is somehow bad.
Thank you for highlighting this.  I was hoping we might get to this in Pr. Morris' Areas of opportunity in racial conflict thread.  It's what I was getting out with how money is being wasted from doing things wrong.  Education is certainly one of them, and more money is not a panacea.

What I find frustrating is the prevailing initial assumption that we cannot improve the lives of some minorities unless we can improve it for all of them.  It's unrealistic to think we can improve all failing school systems any time soon.  Why do we not have more upward mobility among minorities?  Not enough get a decent education to make them employable in higher skilled jobs.  How about we "save" the ones we can, which will eventually create greater candidate pools in the job market.  Like I said in the other thread, in my engineering world we don't racially discriminate in hiring; we see effectively zero minimally qualified minority candidates.

But no, we can't have vouchers or charter schools.  The national teacher unions are against it, because it will "hurt" public education.  Actually, I think public education in certain places is doing a great deal of harm without any help from vouchers.
Sterling Spatz
ELCA pew-sitter

Charles Austin

  • ALPB Contribution Leader
  • *****
  • Posts: 14904
    • View Profile
    • Charles is Coloring
Re: Unholy
« Reply #248 on: July 01, 2020, 11:41:30 AM »
Apparently, in this thread and in that other thread, something has happened to throw chum in the waters. The sharks smelled it and the feeding frenzy is underway. The sharks want to feed and chew on the bloody flesh; they are not interested in discussion.
I think Iíll row my small dinghy to calmer waters hoping that fish more friendly will show up. Got no hooks, so weíll talk rather than seeK one anotherís demise.
Retired ELCA Pastor. Iowa native. Oh, my. How close we were to a situation where many people with guns couldíve killed many members of Congress. The possible result? Martial law and/or Civil War. Thank God some people are still coming forward to tell the truth.

MaddogLutheran

  • ALPB Contribution Leader
  • *****
  • Posts: 3585
  • It's my fantasy football avatar...
    • View Profile
Re: Unholy
« Reply #249 on: July 01, 2020, 11:45:59 AM »
Are you sure you're responding to the correct thread?  The recent discussion on this one has only been about school vouchers and charter schools.  Is that troubling, unlike sexist comments that make you smile?  "Republicans pounce!"

It's good to know you are the one reasonable person here.  The rest of us are just crazed partisans obviously.  Your signal of virtue is hereby noted.
Sterling Spatz
ELCA pew-sitter

Coach-Rev

  • ALPB Forum Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 492
  • Rev. Jeff Cottingham, STS
    • View Profile
    • Trinity Lutheran Church
Re: Unholy
« Reply #250 on: July 01, 2020, 12:38:18 PM »
For heaven sake, again, Pastor Fienen! Is everything, and I mean everything in any discussion related to that damned wedding cake? Maybe you could find another example of how you think you and your people are so victimized and oppressed.

Well, it's not "me and my people who are so victimized and oppressed," but does 63 million dead children, a disproportionate number of whom are Black count?

Still waiting, patiently and respectfully for an answer...

<crickets...>

all the while the humble correspondent ignores accusations against him of sexism bias and posts on "all" black lives that matter...  I'm not surprised.  Neither am I amused.  I didn't even "smile" just a bit.

Apparently, in this thread and in that other thread, something has happened to throw chum in the waters. The sharks smelled it and the feeding frenzy is underway. The sharks want to feed and chew on the bloody flesh; they are not interested in discussion.
I think Iíll row my small dinghy to calmer waters hoping that fish more friendly will show up. Got no hooks, so weíll talk rather than seeK one anotherís demise.
"The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never know if they are genuine." - Abraham Lincoln

blog:  http://coach-rev.blogspot.com/
photography:  https://jeffcottingham.smugmug.com/

peter_speckhard

  • ALPB Administrator
  • ALPB Contribution Leader
  • *****
  • Posts: 19391
    • View Profile
Re: Unholy
« Reply #251 on: July 01, 2020, 12:43:13 PM »
Apparently, in this thread and in that other thread, something has happened to throw chum in the waters. The sharks smelled it and the feeding frenzy is underway. The sharks want to feed and chew on the bloody flesh; they are not interested in discussion.
I think Iíll row my small dinghy to calmer waters hoping that fish more friendly will show up. Got no hooks, so weíll talk rather than seeK one anotherís demise.
What are you talking about? You posted something about not wanting any public funds used to send kids to schools like ours. I responded. Who is chumming the waters?
« Last Edit: July 01, 2020, 12:45:04 PM by peter_speckhard »

Matt Hummel

  • ALPB Contribution Leader
  • *****
  • Posts: 2852
    • View Profile
Re: Unholy
« Reply #252 on: July 01, 2020, 12:46:01 PM »
P. S. And we do allow homeschooling. I donít think thatís a good idea, but we allow it. There you are.

Is that the royal "we?" What gives you the right to pass judgement on homeschooling? What do you actually know about it? When I was a Lutheran and surrounded by clergy like you, who would also say they didn't know homeschooling families, I would smile and think of the families from our homeschool co-op who were in ther parishes, but knew to keep their mouth shut because they knew their pastor was as narrow minded and judgemental as you.
Matt Hummel


ďThe chief purpose of life, for any of us, is to increase according to our capacity our knowledge of God by all means we have, and to be moved by it to praise and thanks.Ē

― J.R.R. Tolkien

peter_speckhard

  • ALPB Administrator
  • ALPB Contribution Leader
  • *****
  • Posts: 19391
    • View Profile
Re: Unholy
« Reply #253 on: July 01, 2020, 12:51:15 PM »
P. S. And we do allow homeschooling. I donít think thatís a good idea, but we allow it. There you are.

Is that the royal "we?" What gives you the right to pass judgement on homeschooling? What do you actually know about it? When I was a Lutheran and surrounded by clergy like you, who would also say they didn't know homeschooling families, I would smile and think of the families from our homeschool co-op who were in ther parishes, but knew to keep their mouth shut because they knew their pastor was as narrow minded and judgemental as you.
What is breathtaking is how raising one's own children is now something one does by the benevolent leave of the government. Really? You'll let me educate my children as long as I pay for the school they aren't using? That's really big of you. 

Brian Stoffregen

  • ALPB Contribution Leader
  • *****
  • Posts: 44466
  • ἐγὼ δὲ λέγω ὑμῖν, ἀγαπᾶτε τοὺς ἐχθροὺς ὑμῶν
    • View Profile
Re: Unholy
« Reply #254 on: July 01, 2020, 12:53:32 PM »
Hasn't the government said, "No one can discriminate against homosexuals?" They did not say, "It's OK for Christians to discriminate against homosexuals if they want to."

Yes, and Jack Phillips objected in his very narrow situation, where he was asked to use his artistic talents to endorse a message, that forcing him to endorse the message violated his civil rights. 


From what I've read, (a) a baker can object to what message is written on a cake, e.g., no profanity; (b) in this particular case, there had been no discussion of what would be written on the cake.
"The church Ö had made us like ill-taught piano students; we play our songs, but we never really hear them, because our main concern is not to make music, but but to avoid some flub that will get us in dutch." [Robert Capon, _Between Noon and Three_, p. 148]