Now you’re simply being intellectually dishonest, Brian. You moved from an empty church, no one hearing, to some not hearing.
And the point remains. If some are not going to listen to the Word of God because they’re not sufficiently entertained or the tech is not top notch, there’s something deeper, more troubling going on. IOW, if it’s like you flicking through movies that you find entertaining... 😳
The original topic was about the quality of the production. I suggested that if the quality is so bad that no one is listening to the live streaming, it's like preaching to an empty church. The Word lands in no soil. I further suggested that if the production quality (not the sermon quality) is bad, folks may stop listening - again, when there's no soil, the word can't be planted and take root. I see nothing dishonest about this. The topic is the quality of the production. The better the quality the more likely people are to tune in and keep listening.
You don't think people, even back in my parent's generation, flipped through TV channels to find a more entertaining worship service? Billy Graham drew thousands to his crusades and TV shows. Other evangelists were not so entertaining. I would watch Oral Roberts because of the quality of the programming. (I didn't care much about the message back then.) They put on a good music show.
This topic is valuable to me because live-streaming is not something I envisioned as a major ministry tool in my personal mid-70s, and I've had to adjust my brain and think it through some.
We have a lot to learn, but currently have up to 10 times the viewership than normal worship attendance. Since mid-March, all services are services of the Word. Since mid-March, one service a week is informal in my dress and in basic approach; one service is more formal in my dress and in the movement of the service (absent Eucharist).
Worship attenders tell me that they appreciate the live-streaming but absolutely are hungry and longing for in person worship to be with their fellow parishioners. Some of the rest of the people viewing are interested in joining the fellowship, even though they do not live in New York - that's a new one on me. Some of the rest of the people viewing are known to me, many are not. And there are at least six times as many of them as regular attenders.
We've spent zero dollars in boosting our audience, zero dollars or time in buying email lists or any of the other online resources. We probably should do those things. I don't know exactly how to do those things.
We're missing a lot of "our own" people - members and regular attenders without internet or ability to connect to our venues - Facebook, You Tube. Or who don't know about it. Or kids, who we're really missing because we haven't figured out online Sunday School yet. Youth and young adults know how to work the system, so they get what they want or stay away from what they don't want. I'm thinking of contacting neighborhood attenders and doing a scheduled "walk-by" this week, not going in but standing outside and shooting the breeze with them. Something. A "virtual coffee hour" in a couple of weeks. Somebody put together a video virtual birthday hug for me so I got surprised at the end of the service with around 15 minutes of greetings in vimeo format. Very cool, emotional for me. Something I couldn't do myself.
So these are my insights to date:
Look directly into the camera from not too far away and not too close. Make eye contact with the camera almost all the time. Don't face away.
The center is the message. Viewer stats show that overwhelmingly. Keep the message/sermon to 15 minutes or so, tell stories with a point, leading to the text and the Point, which is Jesus, and get out of there. Doctrine through the stories - I know, that can't be right. But it is right. And look directly into the camera.
What do people hang in there for?
a) The message, connected to a/the text
b) some of the songs - I sing a solo Spanish song (unless somebody sneaks in and joins, which hasn't happened), and we sing some of our repertoire along with traditional hymns. Lots of positive comments on that
c) prayer time - huge prayer list, and people stick in to hear the prayers as I pray them. Important, and ex corde, leading to the Lord's Prayer.
The rest - and this can be checked out through the various service providers, is up and down, in and out. The viewer is in charge of viewing, not me.
Interior/member attenders watch the whole service, and are interacting with one another all the time, sharing prayer stuff and support, telling one another what they're up to - coffee hour in the comments section during the service. Again, the viewer is in charge, not me.
Contributions: This has worked better than I thought, through PayPal. Who knew? Not me.
Follow-up with the comments section by me is where the pastoral side of the interaction kicks in. Which again is weird, but real. "didn't know your aunt was sick," etc. etc. Followup phone calls or texts or what'sapps, or facebook messenger - way out of my comfort zone but must be done and done expeditiously, because here you need to......
Stay alert - very hard, very necessary, because stuff is happening and happens rapidly - "the older woman across the street was just taken out in an ambulance. She never left the house since February but the person upstairs had a home attendant who had the virus, and the older woman caught it from her. Nobody can see her in the hospital - what should I do?" No easy answer there. That goes in the online prayer list, and so becomes part of the congregation's ministry.
Anyway, how to use this online worship tool at this time for Christ and Kingdom is always on my brain.
Dave Benke