Here I am, violating my general principle of not responding to anonymous posters. (And I thought we didn’t allow them here.)
So The New York Times corrects what it got wrong in a story (which it often does) and you find that a reason to criticize the newspaper?
"Charles Austin":
The reporter who "got it wrong" was Apoorva Mandavilli. She is the 2019 winner of the Victor Cohn Prize for Excellence in Medical Science Reporting.
"Getting it wrong" by overexaggerating the number of U.S. children who have been hospitalized for COVID-19 by 837,000 cases is not something I would expect from a Victor Cohn Prize winner.
Incorrectly reporting actions taken by regulators in Sweden and Denmark for Covid vaccinations is not something I would expect, either.
The correct information is readily available -- How did Apoorva Mandavilli and the NYT get it so wrong that they had to issue a correction?
And, I'll note, the "partisan scream machine",
Citizen Press has not had to issue a correction for their article. Why? The
Citizen Press article relies on CDC data.
Where did Apoorva Mandavilli and the NYT get their data?
A quick addendum:
Apoorva Mandavilli is the NYT lead coronavirus correspondent.