There is some discussion over whether certain documents have juridical "standing." There are also different ways to approach what may appear to be "violations," even if it is not clear whether such things are the violations of ordination vows, of the constitutions of the ELCA, its synods, or congregations, or some other aspect of our common life.
Some take a juridical approach - a document says this, he or she says or does something else, out with them! Some say this requires a clearer understanding of what document or policy says or intends to accomplish, so we need a more official and detailed interpretation of the document.
Some take an approach that might be called "pastoral," though that does not seem to be the right word. Someone may appear to be in "violation," but those responsible for discipline believe that to exercise the discipline or apply the severest penalty - expulsion - would not seem to serve the mission of the Church, or that uncertainties about the "juridical" aspects mean that the penalties should be, if not withheld completely, at least suspended temporarily.
We in the ELCA do not all agree on every aspect of all the issues relating to sexuality. It would appear that in large parts of our church, people are seeking changes, while in other parts of our church, people believe that change would be wrong. Various "sides" of this discussion are using different methods, some juridical, some pastoral, some political, of advancing their concerns. It's messy sometimes, but it seems to be how we do things.
