IOW, the question for the ELCA and the LCMS is, "How are we living out the Biblical truth that God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit relate to man and woman, not according to their sexual distinction as male and female, but according to the Nature of God?"
The Biblical truth is that God relates to mankind according to His nature? Kind of a no-brainer, isn't it?
If it's a no-brainer then why does the LCMS (mis)use Scripture to prove God the Creator established a structured order where man and woman relate to each other according the their supra or sub ordinate position in the structure?
??
But this is thread is about the ELCA Social Statement.
Indeed, it is. So why ride in on your hobby horse, criticizing the LCMS about your favorite issue?
Please note that several LCMS contributors to this Forum joined the conversation on the basis of the Catechism and the Table of Duties... only then did I join the conversation.
In regard to what you refer to as my "hobby horse"..... My issue happens to be a deep concern for what the Bible teaches and for doctrine as presented in the Lutheran Confessions.
I do not know your LCMS background. Mine began with baptism in a small LCMS congregation on the northern end of Manhattan. Beginning in the third grade my parochial school teachers were LCMS trained men with a highly liturgical emphasis on worship. Daily chapel was an integral part of every day.
My 7th and 8th grade teacher was the "master teacher" of my educational experience. At the time Robert Schnabel was working of his doctorate at Fordham University. In addition to the Bible, Catechism, hymnal and a CPH book on Church History we had to keep a personal note book. Prior to Friday we had to have read the Introit, Gradual, Collect and lessons for the upcoming Sunday to establish the theme of the day. In the 7th grade we also had to prepare a written summary of the Gospel and state how the text spoke to us. The goal was that we learn to read Biblical texts as God's Word written to us personally. The same process was followed in the 8th grade when the focus was on the Epistle for the day.
With this as the foundation for how I read Scripture and on the Confessions, I have come to conclude there is no Biblical or Confessional basis for the claim that there two orders in the church upon which the identity, purpose and relationship of man and woman are based. You may disagree, but I find your comments as directed to me not in keeping with how I understand the relationship of who we are as brother and sister in Christ.
I wish for you a blessed Advent as we again prepare to celebrate the mystery of our Lord's Incarnation.
marie meyer