To return momentarily to the original question (Huh?):
I have a personal reason to be concerned regarding the state, financial as well as otherwise, of the ELCA seminaries. I have a child who is quite seriously in the discernment phase regarding a call to ordained ministry. Hence, starting to look at and learn about the seminaries. I am filled with awe, as well as fear and trembling. There is much to be concerned about, not just finances but other matters as well. So my fervent prayer is that these schools manage to get their acts together and straighten up and fly right.
One thing I think has not helped has been the lack of financial support of its seminaries by the ELCA. My own synod does not contribute a cent to any of the seminaries. The good news is that this was a matter of some discussion at the last synod assembly, and the person who went on to be elected bishop stated this was something that had to change in the future. I hope it does. It does no good to sit around and wring our hands and moan and groan about the state of seminary education if we aren't willing to commit ourselves to financial support and ownership. You get what you pay for, and I think the ELCA proves that with what we have been willing to pay for with the seminaries.