Mr. Erdner writes (proving he does indeed read my comments):
When a thriving congregation, with many active mission and ministry programs operating that benefit God's people, is forcibly closed in the name of raw greed because a church body covets their property, there is no possible way to view the success of those who sought to destroy the congregation as anything but a tragedy. There is no defense for the reprehensible action of the ELCA's local synod. There is no "bright side" to having a congregation dragged through the legal system so that its property can be stolen through the scheming of lawyers.
I comment:
Now I am going to make a statement; and then comment on the statement, so be patient and wait for the whole package.
When a group of people, so possessive of "their" church, attempt to steal that church away from the ELCA, resort to trickery and deception and illegal actions to do so, thereby forcing the true, loyal members of that church to go to court and save what is - in the sight of God and the law - rightfully theirs; there is no possible way to see the action of those who tried to take that church out of the ELCA as anything but raw selfishness and utter disregard for the rest of the congregation, the synod and the ELCA; and there is indeed a"bright side" to when the true and loyal members of the congregation triumph.
Now.... here is the difference between Mr. Erdner's mean-spirited, erroneous, and foolish-to-the-extreme comment and what I just wrote.
I know my sentence is nonsense and foolish.
He is so deluded as to think that his foolish and mean-spirited statement is true.
Mr. Erdner writes:
There are times when even the ELCA's number one cheerleader should simply hid his head in shame at being part of such an organization, and should refrain from compounding the tragedy by attempting to defend the indefensible.
I comment:
There are times when even the ELCA's most persistent and ill-informed critic should simply hide his head in shame for posting such vicious diatribes against fellow members of the church to which he belongs, even though he "belongs" simply because he hasn't the guts, energy or integrity to go anywhere else.