"Justified and Sinner" , I don't mock them, I just don't understand where they get the info that Fort Wayne is teaching EO theology and practice. I never heard one prof encourage or out right teach EO theology. I've been to their houses, drank their booze and nope no EO teaching going on. Larry Rast and John Pless, Good Lutheran theologians, not EO. Art Just, nope not EO. Dean Wenthe, again not EO. So, until they can concretely prove that something is afoul at CTS, they should just stop their "lies."
Also, why should the Seminary or Bishop Benke or any DP submit to some silly "Walther purity test" that New Haven and Lutherquest concoct? I also find it interesting that the man behind Lutherquest has left the LCMS, yet he consistently writes articles about how bad the LCMS is.
I tried to get a account on their board and was denied. Gave my yahoo and my hotmail e-mails and were not accepted. Maybe I'm not in e-mail fellowship? 
Rev'd. Matthew J. Uttenreither SSP
Matthew,
First off, the charge was that they tolerated and didn't correct seminarians work, that appeared in a student produced paper. I do find it funny that the blame was put at Dean Wenthe's feet, and at our SP's by extrapolation. I can't really see our SP in full regalia of the East, nor dealing with the limitations that system of polity puts towards evangelism. ( Personally, if Benedict got rid of the edicts of Trent, and the silly celibacy rule....the conservative fransiscan groups are more appealing thant he east!) But again, the question is - why isn't someone correcting these kids? (or perhaps they are ?)
So the question appears - why is it Fort Wayne guys go East, as opposed to West? Is there a tie between the love of liturgy? Perhaps! What about the role of herr pastor, in a culture that doesn't recognzie it? The East also seems a great option.
A bigger question - why are we losing pastors and theologians in general - to the east (Pelikan comes to mind) and to the west (R Neuhaus) Having read their works, it seems that the things that drew me from my non-denom world to the LC-MS are never mentioned. Yet they are so intrinsic to my ministry. Some may say it is because of internal struggle - but ours is nothing compared to the SBC's fights or those in the UMC, (never mind the conflicts among the catholic denoms.... invite a Jesuit priest, a Benedictine monk, a Maronite and a Fransiscan over for dinner some time!)
My point still stands, a good majority over there you are in fellowship with, right? Others, given a chance to talk - you would find your theology compatible to theirs. Pray for them, a lot.
God bless,
J&S